It is economical and environmentally friendly:
- renewable energy source;
- energy efficient – saves more than 90% of the energy used for conventional air conditioning;
- proven technology;
- decreased reliance on fossil fuels – reduced air pollution, acid rain, global warming;
- short economic payback period;
- cost effective over the long term – twice the life of chillers coupled with a significant energy cost savings;
- cost are nearly independent of future energy price increases;
- cold seawater availability for secondary applications;
- reduction in fresh water use compared to conventional A/C systems.
There are currently six institutions that utilize this technology and two projects in progress:
Conventional air conditioning is expensive to operate due to large electrical power requirements. The process uses evaporative cooling of a gas to transfer heat. A simplified illustration of the process is below:
- An AC powered compressor compresses gas resulting in the generation of heat.
- The gas (shown as red in the figure) runs through a set of coils for heat dissipation and condenses into a liquid.
- The liquid passes through an expansion valve quickly evaporating into cold low-pressure gas.
- The cold gas (shown as blue in the figure) runs through a set of coils for heat absorption cooling down the air inside a building.
Large commercial buildings use the expansion of the refrigerant gas to cool water instead of cooling the air directly (called a chiller unit). Chilled water is then pumped throughout the building to provide air conditioning. Furthermore, large systems utilize cooling towers to more efficiently cool the high-pressure side of the system (shown as red in the figure above and the top part of the figure to the left). All of these components, compressors, water pumps and cooling towers, contribute to the high operating expense of conventional AC systems.
- Water is pumped from a deep cold water source (ocean or lake).
- The water is passed through a heat exchanger.
- A closed-loop fresh water distribution system is pumped through the heat exchanger cooling the water.
- The cooled water is distributed to buildings for air conditioning.
There exist three main components of deep water cooling. These basic components can be optimized for each specific location, climate and building.
- A sea/lake water open loop supply system which pumps deep cold water through a heat exchanger and returns the warm water through a shallow outfall (note that in Enwave’s design the water is not returned to the lake but used for the city’s water supply).
- A fresh water closed loop system pumps warm water through the cooling station heat exchanger and distributes the cooled water among commercial, residential and institutions for air conditioning.
- A heat exchanger (cooling station) transfers heat from the fresh water distribution loop resulting in cold water for air conditioning purposes.
Sea water air conditioning has many environmental advantages over that of conventional a/c systems:
- Ninety percent reduction in energy consumption
- Reduction in the local energy grid requirements
- Decreased reliance on fossil fuels
- Reduced air pollution
- Reduced acid rain
- Reduced impact on global warming
- Reduced ecological & political impacts of resource extraction
- No use of ozone-depleting chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs)
- US federal air quality legislation has banned the manufacture and importation of these refrigerants
The existence of the deep water ocean heat sink results from natural climatic processes where water is cooled at the poles, becomes dense and sinks to deeper water. The graph above illustrates a temperature profile in the tropics typical for the world’s deep oceans: 7°C or colder can be reached at 700m depth, 5°C or colder at 1000m. The deep-water portion of this profile changes little seasonally and therefore cold water is available on a year-round basis.
The economic viability of a SWAC system is site specific. Each location has unique opportunities as well as problems. The main factors influencing the economic viability of a specific location include:
- The distance offshore to cold water: shorter pipelines are more economical than long pipelines.
- The size of the air conditioning load: there is an economy of scale associated with SWAC – systems less than 1000 tons are more difficult to justify economically.
- The percent utilization of the air conditioning system: The higher the utilization throughout the year, the higher the direct benefits.
- The local cost of electricity: A high cost of electricity makes conventional AC more costly and SWAC, in comparison, more attractive. Any cost analysis should include current and future costs of electricity.
- The complexity of the distribution system on shore: SWAC works best with a district cooling arrangement, where many buildings are cooled taking advantage of the economy of scale. SWAC is even more economical if this distribution system is compact.
The figure to the right illustrates the difference in lifetime costs for a conventional AC system and a typical SWAC system. The costs are broken down into capital, operating (energy) and maintenance. The primary cost of a SWAC system is in the initial capital cost. The operating and maintenance costs are small. For a conventional AC system, the primary cost is in the power consumed over its lifetime. Hence, SWAC systems are ideal for base load AC that has high utilization and conventional AC may be better for situations of infrequent use.
It’s important to note that there is a dramatic economy of scale as the size of the pipeline increases. The reason is that the cold water pipe costs per liter of water delivered decreases as the pipeline size increases and temperature rise via large pipelines is practically negligible. The figure to the left illustrates five SWAC scenarios of varying overall size; the two bars compare the life time cost difference between conventional AC and SWAC.
SWAC feasibility studies for a variety of sites indicate that electrical consumption is typcially reduced by 80 to 90 percent. Simple payback can be from three to seven years, and long term costs can be half that of a conventional air conditioning system. Not all locations, however, are ideal. Some have poor access to deep cold-water sources or the overall size is too small to be economical.
Cornell Lake Source Cooling Project contains a great deal of information regarding deep lake water air conditioning.
Environmental News Service Aug. 1999 Article: Seawater Irrigates Crops, Cools Buildings.
enwave’s Deep Lake Water Cooling System contains general information about Toronto’s deep lake water cooling system.
Geotimes July 2002 Article: Lake Creates Natural Air Conditioner.
Makai is the leading provider of SWAC engineering services and has completed numerous feasibility, preliminary design, final design and construction management services for SWAC projects.
National Geographic Sept. 2004 Article: The AC of Tomorrow? Tapping Deep Water for Cooling
Natural Energy Laboratory of Hawaii Authority (NELHA) has research and educational programs centered around their deep seawater supply systems.
Ocean Resources 2000 Article: Air Conditioning with Deep Seawater: A Cost-Effective Alternative.
Honolulu Star Bulletin Oct. 2003 Article: Med School Plan utilizes sea water in air conditioning.
Honolulu Star Bulletin Dec. 2004 Article: Cold Water Air Conditioning Project Merits Warm Reception.
Honolulu Advertiser March 2005 Article: Seawater technology part of plan